It has been a while since I’ve written anything about the research aspect of writing historical novels, but here I am, mostly because I’m reading [asa book]0525950540[/asa] Mistress of the Revolution.
This is Catherine Delors’ first novel, and I would call it a great success. I confess I was a little worried; the French Revolution has been written about so widely that it’s not easy to capture the interest of dedicated readers of historical fiction. Delors pulls this off, because her character and story are strong enough to overcome background historical events that are – to some at least – too familiar. From her website, about this novel:
In 1815 England, an exiled Frenchwoman, Gabrielle de Monserrat, begins a memoir of her days before and during the French Revolution. Gabrielle, the youngest daughter of a family of the impoverished nobility, recalls her journey through hardships and betrayals by three men in her life.
Which sounds a great deal like other novels and plots. But wait. If you ask Delors directly, you get a much more interesting take on the novel:
My ambition became to make the French Revolution, often perceived as a confusing medley of events and characters, understandable for a reader without any scholarly knowledge of the period. I wanted to explain in an accurate manner how the chain of events led from idealism to bloodshed and international catastrophe, all through the eyes of an intelligent female witness.
And then from the first page of the novel itself:
These tidings from Paris have affected my spirits today. I never cry any more, yet feel tears choking me. I know that I must not allow myself this indulgence, for it is far easier to keep from crying than to quit. Nevertheless, over twenty years have passed since the great Revolution, and it is time for me at last to exhume my own dead and attempt to revive them, however feebly, under my pen.
These things taken together might have been enough for me to order the book, but the kicker was her resources page. Go on, have a look. Now, Lelors is a native of France and as such knew a lot about the Revolution to start with (especially as her father is a professor of history). But she knew she needed more material than what she had learned from second hand historical works and textbooks, and so she immersed herself in memoirs of the time.
[asa left]1591020093[/asa] The sheer number of available memoirs is stunning. It’s not surprising that so many people in that time and place recorded their memories, given the terrible events they lived through (or failed to live through). But these are riches for the historical novelist. I’m particularly aware of that these days as there are so few memoirs written by women who lived in my version of New-York between 1794 and 1824. I am reading one right now — Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s Eighty Years & More — and it is so well written and full of excellent detail that it makes me sad that there aren’t more memoirs like this one. Reading memoirs and diaries (diaries are sometimes even better) is the closest I can get to really hearing the voices of the women who interest me.Delors made good use of the materials available to her, and the results are quite tangible.
I’ll have to check this book out — though other historical eras are of more interest to me now, I did take a whole class on the French Revolution in college.
Thank you so much, Rosina, for reading my novel and visiting my website! I look forward to hearing your opinion once you are done reading Mistress.
I just ordered this book — will look forward to reading it — I have a long queue of to-be-read books — so don’t know when I’ll actually get to it but I will!!
Off topic…. Interesting article by Laura Vivanco on Rosina’s 2 latest novels: http://teachmetonight.blogspot.com/.
Now I need to add Catherine Delors to my Must Read list.